Ordained for the whole church


Image: Annalisa Jones

If one does justice to the poor and destitute, then it is good; is this not knowing me?—the Word of the Lord. (Jeremiah 22:16)

Since we have lost nine of our elder clergy in the past year, most to COVID-19, we are in a crisis. Before the pandemic, on a good day, we were stretched thin in providing pastoral care to Indigenous communities with the highest rates of poverty, difficult living conditions, and overall stress, whether in urban or reserve settings across Canada. Now we are facing a human need similar to that in a war zone.

We are doing the best we can to mobilize our pastoral resources under the restraints of the pandemic protocols. To respond to this massive human crisis, we are preparing our next generation of faithful leadership for a number of roles, some of them ordained. As we do that, I have heard dozens of voices from across the non-Indigenous Church caution that they must not be ordained for the whole church—meaning that, if they are not thoroughly acquainted with a Western seminary education, they must be restricted in where they may be able to serve. They may serve as local clergy, but not clergy for the whole church.

Now, I should say that these faithful elders, well known to their communities for decades, proven faithful and pastoral in situations that see more trauma in a year than most paid clergy see in a lifetime (I know; I have been in both places), are not looking to flood the suburban churches looking for work. Yes, for us the most important element is a person’s relationship to Jesus as a disciple. But there is so much more. Most of these folks study hard and commit to life-long learning, many of them following a path that leads to academic credentials, but not in the pattern or path of discernment typical of Canadian non-Indigenous urban and suburban society. I have known a thousand of these men and women, and most of them would last longer in an urban or suburban parish than their “ordained-for-the-whole-church” counterparts would last on a reserve.

Canadian old-line churches have come to occupy less and less of the political, social, and geographical space of Canadian life, and the training of our clergy has reflected our declining boundaries. I do understand that some of these matters have been soured by perceptions of doctrinal and political differences, particularly coming out of the last General Synod. It is hard to explain how we could say—no, promise—that these things would look different in the context of human need and human relationship as they exist on the ground. We can only ask you to trust that this is so.

We intend to roll out a number of initiatives to deploy people and ordain them over the next year or so. We expect them to fulfill the highest expectations of all of the church and that they will be, as much as any seminarian, ordained for the whole church. I understand what laudable goals people are searching for when they say we must ordain for the whole church. I will join them in the search for those goals. But under such laudable goals, a lot of mischief may hide. People ordained for the whole church have caused much mayhem on reserve communities throughout Canadian history, but no one is recommending that they be outlawed or restricted. This is a simple request that Indigenous clergy and workers no longer be demeaned.

Related Posts

Mark MacDonald

Mark MacDonald

Archbishop Mark MacDonald is national Indigenous archbishop of the Anglican Church of Canada.

9 Responses

    1. I didn’t know about this proposed restriction on Indigenous leaders and caregivers in the church. It’s shameful.

  1. Very well said, Archbishop Mark. It’s time that we “Western” Christians understand that the needs and tools of Indigenous peoples are not always identical to what’s deemed “normal”. First Peoples know what is best for them, and it’s time they’re listened to, rather than people wagging fingers over what’s allegedly lacking in those who wish to serve. Blessings.

  2. Thank you for pulling back the veil Archbishop Mark. You are gracious in your observations. But, is the church ready to look at what is behind this “mischief”? By what measures, for example, is a white (Western) seminary education somehow universally applicable while otherwise-educated clerics (i.e. those educated by and in context) are really only kind of ordained? Isn’t ordained ordained? “I have known a thousand of these men and women, and most of them would last longer in an urban or suburban parish than their “ordained-for-the-whole-church” counterparts would last on a reserve.”- I hear a mic drop.

  3. “If they (the ordained) are not thoroughly acquainted with a Western Seminary education, they must be restricted in where they are able to serve….”. This could be said about any newly ordained person who is placed out of their element, i.e. urban, rural, eastern, central, western Canada.

    Ethics, Theology, Pastoral and Biblical standards a given..
    Maybe the Western indoctrinated seminary education needs to get the training programme out of the books and back among the people and listen to their needs in a manner more grounded and round to not only local needs, but all the church needs.

  4. Hear! Hear! How frustrating to have to deal with this kind of discrimination. If there’s a conversation to be had about properly equipping ordained leaders, perhaps we could start with the harm of a theological education often centred exclusively on the work of white, male theologians, and taught in institutions invested in keeping control in the hands of non-Indigenous power holders. Thank you, Archbishop Mark, for advocating so ably for much-needed change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print